Why Does God Allow Suffering? Part Three

On January 30, 2010 · 3 Comments

Part Two of this series explored the most famous responses to the problem of evil. In this post, I’ll tell you what I believe. Before I do that, let me start by saying I’m not a theologian. I know I don’t have all the answers, and even if I were a brilliant theologian, I don’t think I could have all the answers.

God is so much bigger than I am. His ways are higher than our ways. This doesn’t mean, like Susan Jacoby said in her quote from Part Two, that God is “a cruel, capricious Master of the Universe” who we will never be able to understand. This quote from C.S. Lewis in A Grief Observed sums up what I mean:

When I lay these questions before God I get no answer. But a rather special sort of ‘No answer.’ It is  not the locked door. It is more like a silent, certainly not uncompassionate, gaze. As though He shook His head not in refusal but waiving the question. Like, ‘Peace, child; you don’t understand.’

Can a mortal ask questions which God finds unanswerable? Quite easily, I should think. All nonsense questions are unanswerable. How many hours are there in a mile? Is yellow square or round? Probably half the questions we ask – half our great theological and metaphysical problems – are like that.

And now that I come to think of it, there’s no practical problem before me at all. I know the two great commandments, and I’d better get on with them. . . .

Like Lewis says, at the end of the day, we know that it all comes down to love. 1 Corinthians 13 kind of love. Agape kind of love for ourselves, our neighbors, and God. And we have to know that God loves us. A couple of years ago, I wrote this in a letter to a friend:

Yes, I’m still studying and learning about politics and social justice and theology and how it’s all affected by my view of God.  But everything else is garbage compared to knowing Him. If I speak in the tongues of men and angels, if I can explain the problem of evil in four pages or less (with sources), if I can figure out how to end world hunger and distribute housing fairly among different races in America, if I can define and explain the problems and benefits of Calvinism and Arminianism, if I can create peace between Israel and Palestine, but I don’t have love, I am nothing.

As we look at possible explanations of the problem of evil, please keep in mind that your ultimate goal should be deeper, more intimate relationship with God that drives you toward love for yourself and your neighbor. If any of these theological issues drive you crazy instead of driving you toward God, please put them on the backburner. Ask God to give you peace with not having an answer right now. Like Lewis said in the above quote, probably half of our big, hang-up theology issues are nonsense anyway. One day we will understand. If you like thinking about this stuff, or if you feel that you must have a reason to explain pain in your life, or if you want to have some resources to explain your faith to unbelievers, then by all means, read on. But if this is going to cause unnecessary doubt and anguish in your faith life, I’d rather have you ignore this post and spend time with the Lord instead.

With that LONG introduction, here’s my take on the problem of evil. Going back to Post Two, I don’t believe the first three responses have much merit to them. I think the atheist argument is right – if God is not good, or if God is not powerful, then He isn’t much of a God. We have to believe that Creator God is good and that He is all-powerful. Otherwise, He is no different from us.

On the other hand, I don’t think atheism works. There is too much purposefulness in humanity for it to have come from random chance. The very fact that we can think on a higher level of “How did we get here?” and “Why does evil exist?” indicates to me that there is something bigger and greater that gave us those capabilities. I suppose you can ignore all of that and still attribute it to random evolutionary progress, but I personally find it more convincing and comforting to believe that a good, all-powerful God had a purpose for everything.

So this leaves the final three responses. As much as my limited mind can conceive of it, I think the truth is a combination of all three. I believe in the actual existence of Satan. I think the Bible is perfectly clear that Satan is actively seeking to bring evil and destruction into the world. But that still doesn’t explain why God allowed Satan to turn away in the first place. And that’s where the other two perspectives come into play. I believe that God allows free will, even for the angels, because love is not love unless it’s freely given. Any parent knows, you can force your kids to obey you, but you can’t force your kids to love you. Hopefully, they will love you and honor you as you love them; but sometimes they don’t. Sometimes they turn away, and forcing them not to turn away means it’s no longer about love. It’s about coercion.

I think sin is not just turning away from God, but it’s also turning away from good, loving consequences. The Bible shows that there are times when God “causes” bad things to happen to people. But it also says that everyone has sinned. So the very title of Rabbi Kushner’s book Why Do Bad Things Happen to Good People? is kind of a moot point to me. I am not good apart from God’s grace. None of us are good.

Now, I’m not saying that a child who gets cancer was so evil and terrible that God brought that cancer upon them. I’m not saying, like some evangelicals have claimed, that the nation of Haiti made a pact with the devil and now God’s letting them have it by sending an earthquake. That kind of God is reflective of the God Susan Jacoby is afraid to believe in. I don’t think our God is a merciless judge.

But He is a judge. Justice is a part of His nature, just as much as mercy and love are a part of His nature. Throughout history, our species has been sinning and causing a lot of bad things to happen. We have created chemicals that cause cancer. We’ve promoted them because money was more important to us than making sure people are healthy and waste is disposed of safely. Nations have held other nations in bondage. Races have held other races in bondage. The poorer people of the world are helpless in the face of natural disasters, and that’s not all to do with the natural disaster. It has a lot to do with social injustices.

As I wrote under the Free Will section in Post Two, even creation is in bondage to the effects of sin and decay. I don’t know this for sure, but I think that when God restores the earth, destructive natural disasters won’t happen the way they do now. I believe at the very least that humans will co-exist with the earth in a completely safe, harmonious way.

So is God directly causing bad things to happen to us because of our sin? In a way, yes. I think the following analogy works well to explain my view. Let’s say a parent has a rule for their young child. – “no playing in the street.” The child can’t understand why the rule is in place. In the child’s mind, the street is a fun place. You can play all sorts of games there that you can’t play on grass. The child has never seen a car hit anyone before, and they can’t really conceive of the danger that could come from playing in the street. But the parent is more knowledgeable; they can see how things will turn out if the child mindlessly plays in a dangerous place. So every day when the child ignores the rule they don’t see a need for, the parent intervenes. They remove the child from the street until the next day, when the whole process starts again. If one day, the parent doesn’t intervene, and a car hits the child, is it the parent’s “fault?”

In a way, it is the parent’s decision to allow the consequences to occur. The parent is smarter than the child. Maybe they should have always intervened. But the first time the child sees a speeding car coming toward them, the first time the child fears for their life, a few things happen. They begin to understand why the rule was in place. They begin to see disobedience as having consequences. They grow a little smarter. They are being shaped into maturity by the suffering.

Does God allow us to suffer consequences of sin (whether our own or the general sin of humanity)? Absolutely. But He doesn’t want us to suffer just for suffering’s sake. He isn’t like a bad parent who needs to punish their children to feel better about their own authority. See? Serves you right to get hit by that car! I hope you learned your lesson! No. In our human weakness, we often respond like that, but I think God is more likely to respond with sadness that things had to go so far before we took Him seriously. If God never allowed consequences, we would never grow. We all know spoiled children, whose parents constantly intervene and never hold them to consequences. Those children inevitably turn out selfish and unpleasant to be around. Our God is a loving Father who knows exactly what kind of discipline will grow us up into mature, wise, beautiful people.

Finally, if my last few paragraphs give the impression that God is a cruel Father who would allow His children to get run over by a car rather than save them every time, let me end with this thought. In the midst of all of our sinning and suffering, God sent Christ to die for our sins and reconcile us to God. The theology of the atonement of Christ is a whole series in itself, so I won’t get into how it all works now. But suffice it to say, we believe that faith in Christ restores us to God and provides a means of ultimate escape from the sin and suffering we have chosen individually and collectively. When we die, it’s not the end. When a young child dies prematurely, it seems unfair that they are paying for the sins of those who have gone before them. But even in that situation, God provides a means of escape from ultimate death. When Christ returns to the earth and the resurrection happens, I believe those children and all who have died in Christ, whether from “natural” deaths or “premature” deaths, will have restored bodies and lives. In the midst of the tragedy in our broken world, we have great hope. Let us not lose sight of that, even as we mourn with those who mourn and work to relieve suffering in this present age.

  • Share/Bookmark

Why Does God Allow Suffering? Part Two

On January 29, 2010 · 1 Comments

In my last post, I raised a difficult question that I’m sure we have all asked at one time or another. If God is good, why does He allow (or cause) suffering?

This is a topic that people who are much smarter than I am have already wrestled with, so in this post, I’ll summarize a few famous responses to “the problem of evil.” In my next post, I’ll share some things God has led me through personally in this area. As always, please share your thoughts and experiences in the comments section. We all grow more through talking about our faith in community!

The following information comes partly from a lecture I heard by Dr. Jerry Root, a Christian Education professor at Wheaton College. At the end of each section, I have added a note about what each line of thinking would mean for the two scenarios I brought up in my last post: the earthquake in Haiti and my step-father’s diabetes.

Attempts to explain “the problem of evil”:

  • God is powerful, but not good. He is the author of all things – good and bad.
    • Job believes in God’s omnipotence (all powerfulness) and believes that God is bringing wrath upon him unfairly. He doubts the love and mercy of a God who would cause so much suffering. In Job 7, Job says:
    • “Therefore I will not keep silent; I will speak out in the anguish of my spirit, I will complain in the bitterness of my soul. Am I the sea, or the monster of the deep, that You put me under guard? When I think my bed will comfort me and my couch will ease my complaint, even then You frighten me with dreams and terrify me with visions, so that I prefer strangling and death, rather than this body of mine. I despise my life; I would not live forever. Let me alone; my days have no meaning. What is man that You make so much of him, that You give him so much attention, that You examine him every morning and test him every moment? Will You never look away from me, or let me alone even for an instant?”
    • Implications: God was judging the nation of Haiti with an earthquake. God was judging my step-father with diabetes. Either because of specific sins or the general sinfulness of all mankind, God used these sufferings to send a message. The message is that sin has unavoidable, painful consequences. If we want to avoid tragedies like these, we must repent and pray for God to have mercy on us. Disasters should make us tremble with fear, for we are, as the famous Jonathan Edwards sermon says, “sinners in the hands of an angry God.”
  • God is good, but not powerful. He doesn’t want evil to happen, but He can’t stop it.
    • Rabbi Harold Kushner advocates this view in his 1981 book When Bad Things Happen to Good People.
    • Kushner’s believes that God doesn’t have the capacity to deal with evil in today’s world. God is good, but not in control. In a 2006 interview with Time magazine, Kushner summarized his viewpoint by saying, “Given the unfairness that strikes so many people in life, I would rather believe in a God of limited power and unlimited love and justice, rather than the other way around.”
    • Implications: God did not want the earthquake to happen. He didn’t want my step-father to contract diabetes. But nature is more powerful than God. There was nothing God could do to prevent the tragedy in Haiti, but He is present as a source of comfort to the victims. Outside of God’s direction, natural causes led to my step-father’s diabetes. God will strengthen him now, but it is up to doctors and other natural causes to help my step-father manage his health.
  • Atheism: There is no God.
    • Atheists argue that to believe in either of the two types of God mentioned above (a God who is powerful, but not good, or a God who is good, but not powerful) is to diminish God so much that He ceases to be a God worth believing in at all.
    • Author and reporter Susan Jacoby wrote a 2007 Washington Post article about her lack of belief in God: “If there were a deity responsible for both human evil and impersonal natural disasters, I would hate him. I would prefer to go to hell rather than to make bargains with such a cruel, capricious Master of the Universe.”
    • Implications: “God” had nothing to do with Haiti or my step-father’s diabetes. Impartial, natural causes and random chance led to these sufferings. We must simply make the best with what we have and not worry about asking “Why?”
  • Free Will: God is good and powerful. He does not cause evil, but He allows humans to cause evil.
    • God is love. True love must be chosen, not forced, so for God to truly love His creation, free will must exist. Free will means that we can choose to cause harm, to sin, and to bring destruction into the world.  God could stop us (He is powerful enough), but if He only gave us the freedom to do good and to love Him, we wouldn’t truly have free will. C.S. Lewis discusses the implications of a world in which God did not allow free will in his book The Problem of Pain:
    • We can, perhaps, conceive of a world in which God corrected the results of this abuse of free will by His creatures at every moment: so that a wooden beam became soft as grass when it was used as a weapon, and the air refused to obey me if I attempted to set up in it the sound waves that carry lies or insults. But such a world would be one in which wrong actions were impossible, and in which, therefore, freedom of the will would be void; nay, if the principle were carried out to its logical conclusion, evil thoughts would be impossible, for the cerebral matter which we use in thinking would refuse its task when we attempted to frame them.
    • Implications: God did not cause the earthquake. Even creation is affected by the sin of mankind. (Romans 8:18-21) So natural disasters themselves are not a result of God’s explicit judgment, nor are they random acts of nature. Rather, they are consequences of creation’s subjection to the bondage and decay created by sin. A similar earthquake struck San Francisco in 1989, but 63 people died, rather than hundreds of thousands. According to an ABC News report, this is directly related to poverty in Haiti. According to this Christian blog, global injustices are to blame for Haiti’s intense poverty. It’s easy to look at a tragedy and “blame” God for allowing it to happen, but in this case, we can clearly see how the sin of people caused such great suffering. God could have prevented the tragedy, but He doesn’t violate the free will He has given us. Rather, at an appointed time, He will judge everyone for the just and unjust things they have done. At that time, justice will be fully restored. Regarding my step-father’s diabetes, God did not “give” it to him, but choices my step-father made in eating and lifestyle habits probably led to the disease. While many of the bad things that happen to us seem like random acts of chance, our entire world system is corrupted by sin and decay. From our genetics, to the products we develop and use, to the businesses and corporations we create, to the natural world, death has a hold on our world. In His love, God has created a plan of escape, through Jesus’ death and resurrection, but until the entire world is resurrected, we will continue to experience the effects of sin.
  • Soul Making: God is good and powerful, but suffering is required to help us grow into maturity.
    • God allows evil and suffering because they develop our character.
    • James 1:2-4 “Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance. Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.”
    • Origen, an early Church father, as quoted in Alister E. McGrath’s 2001 edition of The Christian Theology Reader:  “God does not create evil; still, He does not prevent it when it is shown by others, although He could do so. But He uses both evil and those who show it for necessary purposes. . . . Virtue is not virtue if it be untested and unexamined.”
    • Implications: God allowed the earthquake and the diabetes to develop the character of those who were affected. For people who are willing, suffering leads to perseverance and maturity. This line of thinking is why we like stories with conflict. It isn’t interesting to see “nothing” happen to characters. We like to see development and growth, as obstacles are faced and overcome. For Christians, obstacles may even result in death, but after resurrection, the outcome is still final victory.
  • Satan: God is good and powerful, but He does not stop Satan from causing evil.
    • Job 1 tells how Satan came before God and asked if he could test Job’s faith by causing him to suffer. God not only allowed Satan to do this, He recommended that Satan turn his attention to Job because of Job’s great faith.
    • 1 Peter 5:8 says, “Be self-controlled and alert. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour.”
    • Even in the Garden of Eden, Eve was led into temptation by Satan in the form of a serpent. Throughout the Bible, we see a theme of Satan as the tempter, the thief, the devourer. He is set against God and wants nothing more than to see human beings turn away from God.
    • Implications: Satan and demonic powers (Ephesians 6:11-12) were ultimately behind the earthquake, as well as the factors that led to the poverty that caused so much loss of life. Likewise, they had something to do with my step-father’s diabetes. In order to combat suffering, we must be ready to wage war against Satan and his demons. Through prayer, faith, and God’s word, we must rebuke the evil plans of Satan and refuse to give into temptation when he presents it to us.

Have you heard any of these perspectives before? What do you believe? Is there flawed logic in any of these arguments? Are there other perspectives I’ve left out?

  • Share/Bookmark

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories
Inspired Faith's Most Popular Products:

Click here to see our entire collection of products.